I cannot get more than a certain amount of money - there's a ceiling beyond which no-one will go. It's very frustrating. On the other hand, I don't whinge because there are people out there who don't get any money to make any films at all. So I don't complain. But on the other hand it would be terrific to have the scope to paint on a bigger canvas. I've done it with Topsy-Turvy (1999), which we made for £10 million. I don't know how we did it. We squeezed our £6.5 million to make Vera Drake (2004). Very hard. But if you want that kind of money, quite often they'll say, "Ah, that sounds like a good opportunity for Johnny Depp..." No disrespect to Johnny Depp, he's just an example. And the message is: "If you were to have Johnny, we could give you a great deal more dosh." But I won't go there. Because my job is to make the films I want to make and to have the freedom to explore them, without knowing exactly what it's going to be, and to have actors who will go along with that. But if you get in somebody who's there just so you can raise the money, there are immediate inhibitions. And also, I'm committed to making films that are about this world. You couldn't justify Happy-Go-Lucky (2008) to a potential backer. You couldn't go into Hollywood suite and say, "Well, it's about this teacher..." I think this is true of all my films - I don't think there's a single film where, if you described it, anyone would be blown away!
Show less «